
Orders Pronounced May 14, 2010
ORDERS ON CAUSES
| 08‑0465 |
THE STATE OF TEXAS v. $281,420.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13‑06‑00158‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04‑03‑08) | |
|
|
| 08‑0941 |
THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY (THE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD CONNECTICUT) v. BARRY JOACHIM; from Lubbock County; 7th district (07‑06‑00322‑CV, 279 SW3d 812, 09‑25‑08) | |
|
|
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:
| 10‑0063 |
TAMARA PRINCE v. DAVID L. FOREMAN, D/B/A J&D CONTRACTORS AND GEORGE WESLEY HAIR, JR.; from Tarrant County; 2nd district (02‑08‑00495‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01‑07‑10) |
| 10‑0073 |
BEN RICHARD DRUM v. CYNTHIA FIGUEROA CALHOUN, AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY SAFECO SURETY AND UNITRIN BUSINESS INSURANCE, ET AL.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05‑07‑01520‑CV, 299 SW3d 360, 08‑25‑09) |
| 10‑0233 |
BUCK GLOVE COMPANY v. JON T. NEUBAUM AND BARBARA NEUBAUM; from Montgomery County; 9th district (09‑08‑00491‑CV, 302 SW3d 912, 12‑31‑09) |
ORDERS ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING
THE MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OF THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:
| 09‑1050 |
IN THE INTEREST OF J.D.D. & M.R.D.; from Bexar County; 4th district (04‑08‑00930‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 09‑02‑09) |
| 10‑0036 |
GEORGE R. NEELY v. COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE; from Harris County; 14th district (14‑08‑00526‑CV, 302 SW3d 331, 09‑10‑09) |
| 10‑0173 |
REZA VAFAIYAN v. WICHITA COUNTY, TEXAS; from Wichita County; 2nd district (02‑08‑00465‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08‑06‑09) |
MISCELLANEOUS
THE FOLLOWING DIRECT APPEAL IS DISMISSED:
| 10‑0338 |
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MARIE MAGDALENA KRIEGEL; from Parmer County |
THE FOLLOWING CASE IS REINSTATED:
| 10‑0258 |
ARNOLDO CASAS, ET AL. v. MICHAEL B. SILVA, ET AL.; from
Duval County; 4th district
(04‑09‑00105‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 02‑24‑10) |
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ARE DENIED:
| 10‑0207 |
IN RE CONNIE VASQUEZ HARRISON; from Harris County; 1st
district
(01‑10‑00232‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03‑25‑10) | |
|
|
| 10‑0241 |
IN RE HICKS EDWARD ELLIFF, JR. |
THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS DISMISSED:
| 10‑0077 |
IN RE PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; from
Dallas County; 5th district
(05‑10‑00094‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01‑27‑10) |
THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS STRUCK PURSUANT TO TEXAS RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.4(i):
| 10‑0335 |
IN RE BARBARA REGINA SCHLEIN; from Galveston County; 1st
district
(01‑10‑00283‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04‑15‑10) The Court strikes the petition for writ of mandamus with the following notation: "The petition violates Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.4(f) and 52.6 and is struck." |