Texas state seal

THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS


Orders Pronounced February 5, 2010

ORDERS ON CAUSES

THE MOTION IN THE FOLLOWING CAUSE IS DENIED:

08‑0964 

THE EDWARDS AQUIFER AUTHORITY AND THE STATE OF TEXAS v. BURRELL DAY AND JOEL MCDANIEL; from Atascosa County; 4th district (04‑07‑00103‑CV, 274 SW3d 742, 08‑29‑08)
State of Texas's motion to expand the time allotted for oral argument denied



ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR REVIEW IS ABATED:

09‑0982 

ATRIUM COMPANIES, INC. v. GABLES CENTRAL CONSTRUCTION, INC.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05‑07‑00438‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03‑31‑09)
abatement order issued

[Note: Effective as of January 20, 2010, the case is abated pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 8.2 until further order of this Court and is removed from the Court's active docket, subject to reinstatement upon proper motion. Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. All motions and other documents pending or filed are abated subject to being reurged in the event the case is reinstated. Tex. R. App. P. 8.2 and 8.3. It is the parties' responsibility to immediately notify this Court once the automatic bankruptcy stay is lifted.]


THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:

09‑0710 

JERRY WANZER v. BERNARD GARCIA, ET AL.; from Karnes County; 4th district (04‑08‑00582‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 07‑01‑09)


09‑0852 

ELIZABETH OKORAFOR v. UNCLE SAM & ASSOCIATES; from Fort Bend County; 1st district (01‑07‑00908‑CV, 295 SW3d 27, 04‑23‑09)
as redrafted


09‑0904 

INNOVATIVE CONVEYOR CONCEPTS, INC., ET AL. v. TEXAS INTEGRATED CONVEYOR SYSTEMS, INC.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05‑08‑00654‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10‑06‑09)


09‑1001 

DONALD RAY MCRAY v. CLERK OF THE COURT; from Dallas County; 5th district (05‑08‑01398‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10‑01‑09)


09‑1020 

BOBBY LOUIS COLLARD v. STATE OF TEXAS; from Dallas County; 5th district (05‑09‑01120‑CR, ___ SW3d ___, 11‑10‑09)


09‑1033 

MIGUEL A. LOZANO, JR. v. BROUSSARD INTERNATIONAL; from Bexar County; 4th district (04‑09‑00047‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10‑07‑09)


THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR REVIEW IS DISMISSED:

09‑1016 

OFFICE BUILDINGS OF HOUSTON, INC. v. CARLTON B. NEWMAN; from Harris County; 14th district (14‑08‑00173‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08‑04‑09)
motion to dismiss granted



ORDERS ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING

THE MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OF THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:

09‑0568 

DAVID A. WHITE v. MARTHA HARRIS-WHITE; from Harris County; 1st district (01‑07‑00521‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 05‑28‑09)


10‑0011 

IN THE INTEREST OF R.S., A CHILD; from Harris County; 14th district (14‑09‑00827‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 12‑03‑09)



MISCELLANEOUS

THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ARE DENIED:

10‑0025 

IN RE DALE BRAMLETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF VICKI BRAMLETT, DECEASED, SHANE FULLER AND MICHAEL FULLER; from Lubbock County
emergency motion denied


10‑0033 

IN RE LAKEITH AMIR-SHARIF; from Dallas County; 5th district


10‑0090 

IN RE KAREN BLUDAU; from Montgomery County; 9th district (09‑10‑00036‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 02‑04‑10)
motion for emergency relief denied


THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ARE DISMISSED:

09‑0717 

IN RE STAFFORD A. CONWAY, M.D. AND CONWAY NEUROLOGY SPECIALTIES, PA; from Grayson County; 5th district (05‑09‑00790‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08‑07‑09)
unopposed motion to dismisss granted


10‑0021 

IN RE NRG ENERGY, INC.; from Bexar County; 4th district (04‑10‑00014‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01‑11‑10)
unopposed motion to dismiss granted
stay order issued January 15, 2010, lifted

 


(Chief Justice Jefferson not sitting)

 

THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED:

10‑0094 

IN RE WILLIAM JAMES JONAS III; from Bexar County; 4th district (04‑10‑00055‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 02‑04‑10)
motion for emergency relief denied

 


(Chief Justice Jefferson not sitting)

 

A STAY IS ISSUED IN THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS:

10‑0077 

IN RE PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; from Dallas County; 5th district (05‑10‑00094‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01‑27‑10)
emergency motion for temporary relief granted in part
stay order issued
requested response due by 3:00 p.m., February 16, 2010

 


[Note: The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.]