THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Orders Pronounced October 30, 2009

ORDERS ON CAUSES

07‑0818	AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, L.L.P. v. NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH CORPORATION; from Dallas County; 5th district (05‑06‑01024‑CV, 232 SW3d 883, 08‑29‑07) 2 petitions
	The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment, renders judgment in part, and remands the case in part to the court of appeals. Justice Johnson delivered the opinion of the Court. (Justice Guzman not sitting)

08‑0280	AQUAPLEX, INC. AND JAMES EDWARD JONES, JR. v. RANCHO LA VALENCIA, INC. AND CHARLES R. "RANDY" TURNER; from Travis County; 7th district (07‑06‑00157‑CV, 253 SW3d 728, 11‑02‑07)
	Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court affirms in part and reverses in part the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to that court. Per Curiam Opinion

08‑0413	CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS v. TRAIL ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A WILSON OIL COMPANY, ET AL.; from Harris County; 10th district (10‑05‑00382‑CV, 255 SW3d 105, 04‑09‑08)
	Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals’ judgment and remands the case to the trial court. Per Curiam Opinion

08‑0780	CHRYSLER INSURANCE COMPANY, FORMERLY KNOWN AS DAIMLERCHRYSLER INSURANCE COMPANY v. GREENSPOINT DODGE OF HOUSTON, INC.; from Harris County; 1st district (01‑05‑01115‑CV, 265 SW3d 52, 04‑10‑08) 2 petitions motion to dismiss the cross-petition on behalf of Jack Apple, Jr. granted
	Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court affirms in part and reverses in part the court of appeals' judgment and renders judgment. Per Curiam Opinion (Justice Guzman not sitting)

08‑0829	INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA v. EDWARD LEJEUNE; from Red River County; 6th district (06‑07‑00142‑CV, 261 SW3d 852, 08‑20‑08)
	Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court. Per Curiam Opinion

THE MOTIONS IN THE FOLLOWING CAUSES ARE GRANTED:

08‑0544

IN RE SCOGGINS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13‑08‑00317‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06‑30‑08) motion to lift stay granted stay order issued August 29, 2008, lifted

08‑0660

IN RE SATTERFIELD & PONTIKES CONSTRUCTION, INC.; from Duval County; 4th district (04‑08‑00343‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08‑13‑08) motion to lift stay granted stay order issued October 17, 2008, lifted

ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:

09‑0677

ROBIN BLACKMON-DUNDA v. MARY KAY, INC.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05‑08‑00192‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04‑01‑09)

09‑0729

A.J. STOLL, JR. AND CAROLYN STOLL v. TOM LEWIS AND ANITA LEWIS; from Montgomery County; 1st district (01‑08‑00556‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 05‑14‑09)

09‑0756	ELIDA LOPEZ OLIVER v. LONG ISLAND OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC.; from Cameron County; 13th district (13‑08‑00385‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06‑11‑09)
	(Justice Guzman not sitting)

09‑0758

LARRY KALINA, DIANE KALINA, AND CLINT KALINA v. CODY WILLS BURNS; from Madison County; 14th district (14‑08‑00589‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 07‑23‑09)

09‑0762

JON ERIC JACKS, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A JON ERIC JACKS DEVELOPMENT v. G.A. BOBO, JR.; from Gregg County; 12th district (12‑07‑00420‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 07‑31‑09)

THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR REVIEW IS STRUCK PURSUANT TO TEXAS RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.4(i):

09‑0887

RAFAEL ARMENDARIZ v. GLORIA TRONCOSO; from El Paso County; 8th district (08‑07‑00270‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 09‑09‑09) The Court strikes the petition for review with the following notation: "The petition violates Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.4(d) and is struck. Petitioner is ordered to redraw; the redrawn petition is due to be filed by November 9, 2009."

THE MOTION IN THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED:

08‑0938

HOUSTON WINDCREST WEST ROAD I, L.P. v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER FOR WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK; from Dallas County; 5th district (05‑07‑01261‑CV, 262 SW3d 856, 08‑25‑08) agreed motion to lift stay granted stay order issued February 20, 2009, lifted

ORDERS ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING

THE MOTION FOR REHEARING OF THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR REVIEW IS DENIED:

09‑0500	NASHVILLE TEXAS, INC. v. CITY OF BURLESON, ROVIN, INC. AND PARADIGMS FOR SUCCESS, INC.; from Johnson County; 1st district (01‑08‑00274‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03‑12‑09)
	(Justice Guzman not sitting)

MISCELLANEOUS

THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ARE DENIED:

09‑0554

IN RE VICTOR DEL RIO; from Harris County

09‑0702

IN RE VICTOR DEL RIO; from Harris County motion for intervention denied

THE MOTION IN THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS GRANTED:

08‑0884

IN RE SCOGGINS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13‑08‑00548‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10‑15‑08) motion to lift stay granted stay order issued October 24, 2008, lifted