IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
════════════
No. 07-0228
════════════
Graham Oaks Care Center, Inc.,
New Graham Oaks Care Center, Inc. and
v.
Allagra Farabee and Earlene Price, as Next Friend of Allagra Farabee, Respondents
════════════════════════════════════════════════════
On Petition for Review from the
Court of Appeals for the Second District of
════════════════════════════════════════════════════
PER CURIAM
Allagra
Farabee and Earlene Price, as next friend of Alagra
Farabee, filed this suit claiming Graham Oaks Center, Inc., New Graham Oaks
Care Center, Inc., and
Graham Oaks filed a timely interlocutory appeal with the Second Court of Appeals, which dismissed for want of jurisdiction.[3] For the reasons stated today in Lewis v. Funderburk,[4] we hold that Graham Oaks’ motion seeking dismissal and fees was a motion pursuant to section 74.351(b), and thus reviewable by interlocutory appeal when the trial court denied it.[5] The court of appeals erred by concluding otherwise.
Accordingly, we grant the petition for review, and without hearing oral argument, Tex. R. App. P. 59.1, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and remand the case to that court to consider the remaining arguments raised by the interlocutory appeal.
OPINION DELIVERED: April 11, 2008