
Orders Pronounced May 11, 2007
ORDERS ON CAUSES
THE MOTION FOR REHEARING OF THE FOLLOWING CAUSE IS DENIED:
| 02‑0381 |
F.F.P. OPERATING PARTNERS, L.P. D/B/A MR. CUT RATE #602 v. XAVIER DUENEZ, AND WIFE, IRENE DUENEZ, AS NEXT FRIENDS OF CARLOS DUENEZ AND PABLO DUENEZ, MINORS; from Calhoun County; 13th district (13‑00‑00466‑CV, 69 SW3d 800, 02‑14‑02) | |
|
|
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:
| 06‑1103 |
DOV AVNI KAMINETZKY A/K/A DOV K. AVNI, ET AL. v. FROST NATIONAL BANK OF SAN ANTONIO, ET AL.; from Harris County; 14th district (14‑04‑00074‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06‑01‑06) |
| 07‑0177 |
DONALD RAY MCCRAY v. MITCHELL REID AND SYLVIA MEJIAS, ET AL.; from San Patricio County; 10th district (10‑06‑00362‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01‑24‑07) |
| 07‑0181 |
ELIZABETH H. BAIZE AND BOBBY CRAIG BAIZE v. SCOTT & WHITE CLINIC, AN ASSOCIATION, AND SCOTT AND WHITE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, AND SCOTT, SHERWOOD AND BRINDLEY FOUNDATION; from Bell County; 3rd district (03‑05‑00780‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01‑22‑07) |
| 07‑0183 |
DONALD RAY MCCRAY v. STEPHEN W. ALLEE, ET AL.; from Walker County; 10th district (10‑06‑00279‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 02‑07‑07) |
| 07‑0186 |
WAFIC TAWFIC ATAYA AND SAWSSAN ATAYA A/K/A SAWSSAN MOHAMAD ELEHIKH-ISSA v. THE STATE OF TEXAS; from Harris County; 14th district (14‑05‑01264‑CV, ___ SW3d ___02‑08‑07) |
| 07‑0325 |
IN THE INTEREST OF R.A.P. II, A CHILD; from Harris County; 14th district (14‑06‑00109‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01‑25‑07) |
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE ABATED:
| 06‑0365 |
CITGO REFINING AND MARKETING, INC., AND CITGO PETROLEUM
CORPORATION v. AMELIA GARZA; from Nueces County; 13th district
(13‑03‑00267‑CV, 187 SW3d 45, 03‑23‑06) | |
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR REVIEW IS STRUCK PURSUANT TO TEXAS RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.4(i):
| 07‑0357 |
PATRICIA ANN POTTS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS NEXT FRIEND TO,
MINOR A.W. v. HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, ET AL.; from Harris County;
14th district
(14‑06‑01051‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01‑18‑07) The Court strikes the redrafted petition for review with the following notations: "The petition violates Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b), 9.4(h), 9.5, and 53.2, 53.2(k)(1)(C), and 53.6 and is struck. Petitioner is ordered to redraw; the redrawn petition is due to be filed no later than 5:00 p.m., May 21, 2007." |
ORDERS ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING
THE MOTION FOR REHEARING OF THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR REVIEW IS DENIED:
| 04‑1122 |
PATRIZIO RESTAURANT, INC. D/B/A PATRIZIO'S AND PATRIZIO
PLANO, INC. v. WALESKA BIAGGI; from Collin County; 5th district
(05‑03‑00681‑CV, 149 SW3d 300, 11‑24‑04) |
MISCELLANEOUS
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ARE DENIED:
| 07‑0267 |
IN RE EMTEL, INC., AND BRAZOS EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS ASSOCIATION, P.A.; from Harris County; 1st district (01‑07‑00035‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03‑16‑07) |
| 07‑0273 |
IN RE KIRK WAYNE MC BRIDE, SR. |
THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS STRUCK PURSUANT TO TEXAS RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.4(i):
| 07‑0356 |
IN RE PATRICIA POTTS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS NEXT FRIEND
TO, MINOR A.W.; from Harris County; 14th district
(14‑07‑00065‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03‑22‑07) The Court strikes the petition for writ of mandamus with the following notations: "The petition violates Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b), 9.4(h), 52.3, 53.2(k)(1)(C) and 52.6 and is struck." |