Texas
Supreme Court advisory
Contact: Osler McCarthy, staff attorney for public information
512.463.1441 or click for email
Friday, February 11, 2011
CHIEF JUSTICE JOE R.
GREENHILL, 1914-2011
See also
Chief Justice Greenhill on Succeeding Robert W. Calvert (Windows Media Player format)
On the “Turning Point” of His Life … and His Burial with “Three-Legged Willie” (Windows Media Player)
Joe Greenhill in Photos (PDF format)
His War Reminiscences (Texas Supreme Court Historical Society)
The Joe Greenhill Story (Texas Supreme Court Historical Society)
Former Chief Justice Joe Greenhill, who in 25
years on the Texas Supreme Court was the longest-serving† justice in Texas
history, died Friday in Austin at 96. His 10
years as chief justice were distinguished by transformation in Texas negligence
law, a breakthrough he engineered to allow greater alternative dispute
resolution and his championing expansion of the state’s courts of appeals’
jurisdiction to ease years of backlogs at the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
“Not only this Court, but the people of Texas have lost a great treasure,” said
Chief Justice Wallace B. Jefferson, the fourth person to serve as chief since
Greenhill retired in 1982.
Services
will be at 2 p.m. Tuesday at St. David’s Episcopal Church in Austin. A private
burial will be in the Texas State Cemetery.
Until two years ago he kept regular hours at Baker Botts LLP in downtown
Austin’s San Jacinto Tower, his 16th-floor office looking down on Lady Bird
Lake and offering a sweeping panorama of Southwest Austin and the beginning
breaks of the Texas Hill Country beyond. Always at his desk, or nearby, was his
trademark cigar, handmade Honduran, mostly a stub, always chewed up. He kept a
box of cigars in a cabinet behind his desk. His remarkable legal and judicial
career moved from defending Texas in a desegregation challenge to the
University of Texas School of Law – a U.S. Supreme Court decision he lost that
led to the Court’s landmark public school-desegregation order in Brown v.
Topeka Board of Education – to helping to dedicate a new building for Texas
Southern University’s Thurgood Marshall School of Law. Thurgood Marshall, later
the first African-American justice on the U.S. Supreme Court, was his opponent
in the law school-desegregation case.
As chief justice from October 1972 until October 1982, Joe Robert Greenhill
considered his proudest accomplishments to be his success in passing a
constitutional amendment to give Texas’ 14 intermediate appellate courts
criminal jurisdiction and in changing restrictive laws that discouraged
arbitration and mediation to resolve legal disputes in Texas.
He later worried that arbitration had gone too far.
Ultimately history would call him a good judge, he said before his death, one
who worked for stability in the law. “Generally speaking,” he said, “people who
draw up contracts are entitled to have the law followed.”
“The modern Texas judiciary was born in large part from Joe Greenhill’s
great efforts,” Jefferson said. “I owe him, every Texas judge owes him and the
people of Texas owe him more than mere gratitude can measure.”
Former Chief Justice Thomas R. Phillips called Greenhill a giant of Texas law. “Despite his brilliant academic record and his success in both public service and private practice, he was always modest and approachable,” Phillips said.
“After leaving the Court, he helped open the Austin office of Baker Botts where he mentored a generation of young lawyers.”
Survivors include his wife, Martha, whom he married in 1940 in Tyler, and sons Joe R. Greenhill Jr. of Austin and Bill Greenhill of Fort Worth.
Joe Greenhill, born in Houston on
July 14, 1914, was educated in business and law at the University of
Texas, where he was named to Phi Beta Kappa as an undergraduate and graduated
at the top of his law-school class. He was honored as a distinguished alumnus
of both the business and law schools and was awarded an honorary doctor of laws
by Southern Methodist University.
He was the first briefing attorney to become a justice and the only briefing
attorney to serve twice as a law clerk when he returned to the Court after
service in World War II.
“It was like having an historical figure on the Court,” said former Justice
Scott Brister, who clerked for Greenhill in 1980-81. “He had been on the Court
for so long and had written so much of the law in Texas.”
After Greenhill’s graduation in 1939 from UT’s law school and following a stint
as briefing attorney, he interrupted his legal career to join the U.S. Navy at
the beginning of World War II. He worked in intelligence, then as executive
officer on a mine sweeper, the U.S.S. Control, in the Pacific.
After the war he returned to clerk for the Court, then became first assistant
attorney general. In that role he argued Sweatt v. Painter before the
U.S. Supreme Court, the challenge by Hemann Marion Sweatt, a black postal
worker, to gain admission in 1946 to UT Law School. The issue was not, as
Greenhill later told oral biographer H.W. Brands, whether the state provided
unequal and separate facilities. For Greenhill, the issue was one of principle: Why
would the 14th Amendment, which allowed states to segregate schools in 1868,
prohibit that same practice in 1946?
The state, which provided no legal training for blacks, decided to create a
separate law school for blacks. Legislators, he recalled, “wanted an instant
equal, separate school.”
The U.S. Supreme Court, though, found that Sweatt’s segregated law school was substantially unequal and ordered his admission to the University of Texas.
“He took me to lunch shortly after I became chief in 2004,” Jefferson said. “He wanted me to know that his principled stance in Sweatt took nothing away from his admiration for Thurgood Marshall – and his pride in my promotion as Chief Justice.”
Six years later, after Texas lost that case, Greenhill recalled
that he visited the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., with his son, Bill, the
day the Court issued its decision in Brown v. Board of Education.
Thurgood Marshall, once an opponent, now the elated victor in U.S. history’s
greatest civil-rights case, swept Bill onto his shoulders and ran him through
the white marbled Great Hall of the Court.
Twenty-three years later Greenhill, then chief justice, would honor
then-Justice Marshall in remarks at the dedication of the Thurgood Marshall
School of Law. Greenhill said he talked Marshall into permitting the school to
be named for him when Marshall at first said no.
“‘I don’t want my name on any segregated school,’” Greenhill remembered
Marshall objecting.
“I pointed out to him that the law school was something like 66 percent
African-American,” he said. “And he said OK.”
After Greenhill’s retirement from the Court, the Thurgood Marshall Law Review
dedicated a special issue to him in 1983.
In 10 years as chief justice, Greenhill, then with power to appoint Board of
Pardons and Paroles members, appointed a black woman – a first.
And at a time when women were beginning to enter law practice in significant
numbers, Greenhill was ahead of his time, said one former law clerk, Sally
Miller of Austin. “Most importantly,” she said, “I recall his hiring women law
clerks back when women were still a relatively ‘new thing.’”
Court records show Chief Justice Greenhill had women law clerks on his staff
every year from 1976 until his retirement.
Greenhill, whose mother was the first state social-work director when she was
appointed in 1931, reared him in a Houston home in which she took in working
women as boarders to help them make ends meet. “I grew up in an environment of
working women,” he said. “It seemed natural for me that if they were qualified
to do the work they were just as capable as man to be law clerks.”
But his greatest accomplishment as chief justice, he said, was passing a
constitutional amendment giving the Texas courts of civil appeals jurisdiction over
criminal cases to relieve a backlog at the Court of Criminal Appeals. The
three-judge Court of Criminal Appeals, then the only criminal appellate court
in Texas, labored on a caseload long out of balance.
The amendment also expanded the Court of Criminal Appeals to nine judges.
To pass it, his strategy was to do almost nothing after the Legislature
approved the ballot proposal. “I got it passed by refusing to debate it,” he
said. “People opposing something can find more reasons not to change than you
can imagine.”
He also knew the Federal Communications Commission’s equal-time provision would
work against the amendment proposal. If he spoke on television for it, the
station would be required to give equal time to opponents.
Greenhill helped found the Austin law firm now known as Graves Dougherty Heron
& Moody in 1950 and left it when he joined the Court in 1957, appointed by
his former boss, Price Daniel. Daniel, elected governor after serving as
attorney general, was a leader of the Texas Democratic Party’s conservative
wing.
“Everyone presumed I would also be very conservative,” Greenhill said.
He drew Sarah T. Hughes as an opponent, then a Dallas judge (and who was later
remembered as the federal judge who gave the presidential oath to Lyndon B. Johnson
aboard Air Force One after President Kennedy’s assassination in 1963).
“At that point,” Greenhill said of her challenge, “she was the liberal and I
was the conservative.”
He defeated Hughes in that race. But the political winds changed when he ran to
succeed Robert W. Calvert as chief justice in 1972. Then he would draw
opposition from what he called the far right and insurance companies.
As chief justice he worked for a “more level playing field” in negligence law,
bringing Texas in line with states that adopted a system that would account for
comparative fault among the parties involved in an accident and measure the
risk an injured person assumed before an accident.
Greenhill, whose great-grandfather served as attorney general in Ireland and later
on the Irish Supreme Court, lived with his mother, who reared him as single
parent from the time he was 2. He joined the U.S. Navy after law-school
graduation and his clerkship on the Court he would lead three decades later.
He clerked again for the Court after the war, making him the only briefing
attorney ever to serve separate clerkships.
On a table in his Baker Botts’ office were seven volumes of bound briefing in
the Sweatt case. In a cabinet behind the table he pulled the volume of
the Thurgood Marshall Law Review dedicated to him, proudly showing the symbolic
end of perhaps his most famous case.
Next to that, on a credenza behind his desk, sat a chewed-up Honduran cigar.
† Chief Justice Greenhill served 25 years and 21 days. The second long-serving justice, who, as Greenhill, served as chief justice for part of his tenure, was Reuben Gaines.