THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS


Orders Pronounced November 22, 2005

ORDERS ON CAUSES

04‑1144 

SHIRLEY NEELEY, TEXAS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, ET AL. v. WEST ORANGE-COVE CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL.; from Travis County

 


The Court modifies and affirms in part and reverses in part the trial court's judgment, and remands the case to that court for reconsideration of the award of attorney fees.

Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court, joined by Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice O'Neill, Justice Wainwright, Justice Medina, Justice Green, and Justice Johnson

Justice Brister delivered a dissenting opinion

(Justice Willett not sitting)

- consolidated with -

 
05‑0145 

ALVARADO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. v. SHIRLEY NEELEY, TEXAS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, ET AL.; from Travis County

 


(Justice Willett not sitting)

- consolidated with -

 
05‑0148 

EDGEWOOD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. v. SHIRLEY NEELEY, TEXAS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, ET AL.; from Travis County

 


(Justice Willett not sitting)

 

THE MOTION IN THE FOLLOWING CAUSE IS DENIED:

05‑0374 

IN RE FORD MOTOR COMPANY; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13‑05‑00303‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 05‑11‑05)
real parties' motion for sanctions against Jim Solis and Ford Motor Company denied



MISCELLANEOUS

THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS DENIED:

05‑0965 

IN THE INTEREST OF BABY BOY R., AKA S.V.R., A CHILD; from Dallas County; 5th district


THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS ABATED:

05‑0743 

IN RE JAMES H. BUCHANAN; from Dallas County; 5th district (05‑05‑00969‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 07‑29‑05)
request to continue proceedings, treated as a motion to abate, granted
abatement order issued


A STAY IS ISSUED IN THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS:

05‑0951 

IN RE SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, L.P.; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13‑04‑00403‑CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10‑19‑04)
relator's motion for emergency temporary relief granted
stay order issued

 


[Note: The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.]